Connect
To Top

Bears move a little on voiding of Roquan Smith guarantees, but not far enough

0:00 0:57 Getty Images There’s good news, sort of, regarding the Bears’ impasse with No.
8 overall draft pick Roquan Smith.
However, the Bears haven’t gone far enough to get the deal done.
To their credit, the Bears deftly have couched this dynamic as a “behavior clause,” which makes the Bears sound fair and Smith’s agents seem unreasonable.
But the behavior in question happens on the field during a game.
It’s one thing for a player to be suspended for PEDs or illegal drugs or a violation of the Personal Conduct Policy.
In those cases, the guarantees should void.
But if a player ends up being suspended because of something that happens on the field in the heat of the moment and in blink of an eye (and there’s been an uptick lately in those kinds of suspensions), the team shouldn’t be allowed to then carry in its back pocket a license to later cut the player and stiff him out of his guaranteed pay.
Moreover, it’s unclear whether the Bears have fully given in as to the potential voiding of guarantees for a suspension arising from a violation of the still-vague helmet rules.
The Bears possibly haven’t yielded much at all on this point, with only limited revisions as to the team’s discretion when exercising its right to void guarantees.

Packers LB Jake Ryan suffers torn ACL

0:00
0:57

Getty Images

There’s good news, sort of, regarding the Bears’ impasse with No. 8 overall draft pick Roquan Smith.

According to David Haugh of the Chicago Tribune, the Bears finally have conceded that the Bears won’t void Smith’s future guarantees if the league suspends him for violating the rules regarding the use of the helmet. However, the Bears haven’t gone far enough to get the deal done.

The Bears still want to be able to void future guarantees if Smith is suspended for something that happens on the field beyond the confines of a play — a late hit, a fight, physicality that occurs while a player is defending himself against an attack by an opponent, inadvertent contact with an official, or anything else that could prompt the league office to impose a suspension that is later upheld on appeal. Smith’s camp, per a league source, wants Smith to be protected against the team having the ability to wipe out guarantees over a suspension arising from one hit or one post-play brouhaha.

To their credit, the Bears deftly have couched this dynamic as a “behavior clause,” which makes the Bears sound fair and Smith’s agents seem unreasonable. But the behavior in…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Pro Football

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem?

Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet.

Copyright © 2015 DeVoe Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by Wordpress.